High Price/Earnings Ratios and the Stock Market: a Personal Odyssey
After some forty years of banking and investments, I retired in 2001. But since I do not golf, I soon found retirement to be very boring. So I decided to return to the investment world after ten months. However, those ten months were not a complete waste of time, for I had spent them in trying to utilize my forty years of investment experience to gain perspective on the most recent stock market "bubble" and subsequent "crash."
There were several people who saw the stock market crash coming, but they had different ideas as to when it would occur. Those who were too early had to suffer the derision of their peers. It was difficult to take a stand when so many were proclaiming that we were in a "new era" of investing and that the old rules no longer applied. Since the beginning of 1998 through the market high of March 2000, among 8,000 stock recommendations by Wall Street analysts, only 29 recommended "sell."
I am on record as having called for a cautious approach to investment two years before the "Crash of 2000." In an in-house investment newsletter dated April 1998, I have a picture of the "Titanic" with the caption: "Does anyone see any icebergs?"
When I resumed employment in 2002, I happened to glance at the chart on the last page of Value Line, which showed the stock market as having topped out, by coincidence, in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! The Value Line Composite Index reached a high of 508.39 on April 21, 1998 and has been lower EVER SINCE! But on the first page of the same issue, the date of the market high was given as "5-22-01"! When I contacted Value Line about this discrepancy , I was surprised to learn that they had changed their method of computing the index for "market highs" from "geometric" to "arithmetic." They said they would change the name of the Value Line "Composite" Index to the Value Line "Geometric" Index, since that is how it has been computed over the years. Currently Value Line is showing a recent market low on 10-9-02 and the most recent market high, based on this new "arithmetic" index, on 4-5-04, ANOTHER ALL-TIME HIGH! If they had stayed with the original "geometric" index, the all-time high would still be April 21, 1998!
Later that year, I was pleasantly surprised to read in "Barron's" an interview with Ned Davis, of Ned Davis Research, that said that his indicators had picked up on the bear market's beginnings in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! So, my instincts were correct! I believe that we are in a "secular" downturn that began in April 1998 and the "Bubble of 2000" was a market rally in what was already a long-term bear market.
Another development transpired soon after I resumed employment in 2002. I happened to notice one day that, in its "Market Laboratory," "Barron's" had inexplicably changed the P/E Ratio of the S&P 500 to 28.57 from 40.03 the previous week! This was due to a change to "operating" earnings of $39.28 from "net" or "reported " earnings of $28.31 the previous week. I and others wrote to "Barron's Mailbag" to complain about this change and to disagree with it, since these new P/E ratios could not be compared with historical P/Es. "Barron's apparently accepted our arguments and, about two months later, changed back to using "reported" earnings instead of "operating" earnings and revised the S&P 500 data to show a P/E Ratio of 45.09 compared to a previous week's 29.64.
But a similar problem occurred the next day in a sister publication to "Barron's." On April 9, 2002, "The Wall Street Journal" came out with a new format that included, for the first time, charts and data for the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 Index and Russell 2000, in addition to its own three Dow Jones indices. The P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 was given as 26, instead of the 45.09 now found in "Barron's." I wrote to the WSJ and after much correspondence back and forth, they finally accepted my argument and on July 29, 2002 changed the P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 from 19 to 30! I had given them examples showing where some financial writers had inadvertently confused "apples" with "oranges" by comparing their P/E of 19, based on "operating" earnings, with the long-term average P/E of 16, based on "reported" earnings.
Because I started to be cautious about investing as early as April 1998, since I thought that price/earnings ratios for the stock market were perilously high, I was not hurt personally by the "Crash of 2000" and had tried to get my clients into less aggressive and more liquid positions in their investment portfolios. But the pressures to go along with the market were tremendous!
Price/earnings ratios do not enable us to "time the market." But comparing them to past historical performance does enable us to tell when a stock market is high and vulnerable to eventual correction, even though others around us may have lost their bearings. High P/Es alert us to a need for caution and a conservative approach in our investment decisions, such as a renewed emphasis on dividends. Very high P/Es usually indicate a long-term bear market may ensue for a very long period of time. We are apparently in such a long-term bear market now. But in determining whether the market is high, we must be vigilant with regard to what data mambers of the financial press are reporting to us, so we can compare "apples" with "apples." When the financial information does not appear to be correct, we, as financial analysts, owe it to the investment community to challenge such information. That is what I have concluded from my personal "odyssey" in the investment world.
After three years of the DJIA and the S&P 500 closing below their previous year-end figures, the market finally closed higher at the end of 2003. But the P/E ratio is still high for both indices.
Does anyone see any icebergs?
Henry V. Janoski, MBA, CFA, CSA is a 1955 graduate 'magna cum laude" of Yale University and a member of Phi Beta Kappa. He received his MBA in finance and banking from the Wharton Graduate Business School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1960 and holds the professional designations of Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and Certified Senior Advisor (CSA). As a registered investment advisor representative with the title of Senior Investment Officer, he is located in Scranton, PA. His biography is listed in "Who's Who in Finance and Industry" and in "Who's Who in America." E-mail address: HJanoski@aol.com
More Resources
- Investing:Mutual-Funds Articles from EzineArticles.com
- Using The Google Mutual Fund Screener
The Google mutual fund screener is an important asset for potential investors. Before investing in mutual funds, there are several variables that must be considered. The Google mutual fund screener can help you to determine whether the mutual fund you have in mind is really a safe bet.
Read more - Determining Mutual Fund Prices Today
Mutual fund prices today are rarely the same as they were the day before, and are highly unlikely to remain the same tomorrow. The best place for you to find mutual fund prices today is going to be the Internet, and after that, the finance section of your local newspaper.
Read more - Know More About Sector Funds
Sector funds are mutual funds that concentrate on a particular sector. Such funds have their own share of investors in the market. Are these funds the right investment choice for all? The article below gives more information about sector funds.
Read more - An Intro To Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Mutual Funds
An investment that helps prevent inflation are Treasury Inflation Protected Securities mutual funds. The US Treasury has been issuing them since 1997, and there is a world of difference between them and a regular US Treasury Bond.
Read more - A List Of The Top Rated Mutual Funds For 2012
When it comes to investing, everyone wants to be as sure as possible that they're making a good decision. One thing that can help is an analysis of the current market, including the investments that are yielding the highest returns for investors. The following article includes the top rated mutual funds for 2012.
Read more - Tips To Getting Started With Mutual Funds
So, you're considering taking on your very first investment. With all the options there are out there, just how exactly will you choose? Mutual funds are a great option for beginning investors, as they include a financial advisor to be there by your side the entire way through.
Read more - What Are Mutual Funds And How Do They Work?
Mutual funds can be a difficult concept for people to grasp. However, when it's put simply, the idea is much more accessible. An open-ended fund that an investment company shares with stockholders, who invest in stocks, money-market instruments, and bonds, is a mutual fund.
Read more - Do You Know The Basics Of Mutual Funds?
Are you aware of what you should know walking into investing in mutual funds? What about which company to even go to? Doing your research can make a huge difference in the fate of your mutual fund. The following is some information to help you get started.
Read more - Striving For Diversity In Mutual Funds
When it comes to investing your money, you don't want to take any risks that aren't totally necessary. Understand, however, that there are natural risks involved just in the act of investing alone. Because of this, it's important that an investor knows about the best available mutual funds in their area.
Read more - How To Successfully Invest In Mutual Funds Online
When it comes to investing in mutual funds online, you're going to want to have the fastest Internet connection you can get your hands on. Several accounts and brokers offer information about trading in within milliseconds of it becoming important.
Read more - Ideas For Good Investments In ETFs or Exchange Traded Funds
This is a list of the best ETFs to use for your investment accounts. They are cheap, liquid, and efficient.
Read more - Deciding On The Best Kind Of Mutual Fund For You
The mutual funds that perform the best might not have received the best score from Morningstar; those that receive the highest ratings could still sink out in the financial market. The way a mutual fund has performed in the past and the way it will in the future are two totally separate things.
Read more - Mutual Funds Basics - What They Are And How They Are Categorized?
All mutual funds are is a collection of bonds and stocks. Instead of a single investor owning the entire collection from a company, their portion is merely a single part of a portfolio. This portfolio is made up of different kinds of financial instruments from more than one firm.
Read more - Diversification - How To Do It
Quite simply, it is about not putting all your eggs in one basket. There are many places to invest your money from low return, low risk investments such as cash and fixed interest investments to growth assets such as property and shares, both domestic shares and international.
Read more - The Nature Of Equity Diversified Funds
Do you have an understanding of the nature of equity diversified funds? What about the kind of person who invests in them?
Read more
